Humbled Infidel

Global Warming SCAM! (An Inconvenient Truth)

Comments

[this is good]
Great video. I'm quite tired of the overblown "dangers" of global warning. There are so many exaggerations an inaccuracies it boggles the mind. When they can finally predict next weeks weather accurately, then maybe I'll believe them when they predict the temperature a hundred years from now.
[this is good]
I wonder if in a hundred years the doom-sayers will be back on the "global cooling" exaggerations and inaccuracies.
There are so many Factors at play. There is a thing called Global Dimming.
http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/GlobalWarming/globaldimming.asp

What none of them Talk about is the Volcanic activity that has increased Exponentially In the last 120 Years. Spewing trillions of tons of Gas, Smoke Ash An entire Chunk of Mother earth into the atmosphere at every eruption. None of them talk about The Increase of Earth-Quakes in the Last 200 years. Also releasing billions of tons of Gases Not to mention heating the earth from Friction alone. Then there is the Earths magnetics. Scientists Know about the earth Magnetic field has switched several times in the earths Past. None of which is Taken into account In their so called special Global warming Simulator of Man Made global warming which have far greater affects on the earth then Little ole' ManKind.

A few videos I found on a Quick search... Sure there are better out there.
Pole Shifting Video
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/456536/pole_shift_turning_your_world_upside_down/

Video on Global Dimming and Con trails. and of Course another Theory. And of course it ties in with 9/11 and in three days they got results. Yeah Right. Three days in the life of the Earth. No plains where around a few 100 thousand years ago and we Got Really Hot.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/200720/global_dimming_contrails/



Thanks for the links Norm.
Norm I didn't see the external plumbing you've spoke of. But I did not spend much time looking.
Great post. In the 1970's there was the school of thought, and "undeniable fact" (according to the liberal thinking scientists and media) that the earth was in a "global cooling" pattern, headed to destruction. Now it's global warming, and both observations were true, meaning this was, and is occurring. BUT, cyclical changes in the earth's atmosphere is well documented, at least for the periods of time we can document in history. Given the fact that we can only go back in history so far to review data that was recorded about this, in comparison to the entire life of this planet (still in debate), how can anyone logically declare an absolute truth of any environmental outcome regarding global warming, or any other observations of the earth's changes? Al Gore's movie has so many flaws and untruths that the British schools will only play the movie for it's students if they read and sign a disclaimer pointing out it's numerous fallacies. And the British education system is more liberal than ours. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
That's pretty impressive for the British schools to have them read the disclaimer pointing out it's numerous fallacies.

Why, here in our country the ACLU and like groups will be spewing to the media that we were trying to push religion on government schooled children.

I read in another of your comments that we are in a battle of good and evil. Absolutely!!! We'll have to remember to thank Adam and Eve for desiring to know good and evil. It would be the best blessing to never have known evil! I can only imagine what life would be like without knowledge of evil, and that's with a sinful mind so I can't even comprehend how glorious it would be.
There is absolute good, and absolute evil. We are in a fight with it every second of every day. Not all things are done with the intent towards evil, or the intent towards good. Maybe it's done because it was learned and never questioned. But at some time it was preceded by a thought process by someone who taught the behavior. If we are taught to love, at first we only mimic it until we internalize it and we no longer do it because we want to please our teacher, but because we want to do it. Whether we commit acts of hurt and violence to others knowing it's wrong or not, doesn't excuse the behavior. If every violation of what we have come to know as law is held to a subjective clause, like so many liberals demand, then acts of terror become only acts that have a reason, and therefore, excusable to a point. If every sane individual realized that murder committed in ignorance or folly, is still murder, we would have won this war long ago.
[this is good]
Well penned - That is the very core of our problem.

I took Biblical Counseling and I had to also take required classes (which we as a country should do away with some of the required trash) several of them being Psychology and Psychotherapy. These two were the worst. I am glad now that I took them because if I had not, I wouldn't have known all of the psycho-babble that is main stream in our country.

Basically what is the center of all Psychological thought is there is No God, and no one is responsible for their own behavior. Peoples behaviors are a consequence of someone else's wrongs done to them. Therefore they find it unfair and out of bounds to hold anyone accountable for their actions - It's always someone elses fault.

It's the redirection of responsibility for ones actions. The liberals in our government seats has this mindset through and through. They love playing the victim.

This is played out in our judicial system over and over again. Government psychologist as in DHS, those helping our soldiers overcome PTSD. The Democratic party tried to pass a bill several months back where it would be mandated for every K4- 6th grade child to undergo psychological screening - and could be diagnosed and labeled with any of the psychological disorders, and then make it mandatory for parents to put their children of the psycho-drugs. Which the one common denominator in all of the school shootings even the man that went into the Amish school and killed the little girls, is all of the shooters were on the psycho-drugs.

I see the same psycho-babble being sold to our Veterans through the counseling for PTSD. Just look at IVAW they've gone right into the gutter with the "it's someone elses fault, I can't help myself theory." And in this case the fault is redirected at the United States, the Bush administration, the conservatives, etc.

This is a good link below. It's Ravi Zacharias speaking on moral values. At the end of this video it has a Huckabee piece. But I know that was added and Ravi didn't do this as a political push for a candidate. Someone just put the two together.
Are Moral Values Necessary in Politics
Yes, absolutely psycho-babble. Now, much of what we have learned about human psychology was necessary and good, but it wasn't WHAT we learned that was tainted, it was the WHY psychologists associated with the behavior. The why may be true, but just because there is a reason for anti-social behavior, it shouldn't be excluded from moral judgment or punishment. A society cannot exist for very long if destructive behavior is allowed to threaten the health and well being of others in that same society. Liberals don't get it. They also are absent simple logic when they try to argue their stance that morals should not play a role in the judiciary process. We all know how crazy liberals get when it comes to the environment, in which they feel no hypocrisy calling those who question their theology "immoral", yet isn't the insistence that all people change their behavior and their thinking based on what they perceive to be something "bad", ie: not recycling, ect., a moral judgment on their part? They drive me crazy. Thanks for sharing that clip of Ravi Zacharias. He hits the nail on the head.
I acknowledge people have not been as kind to the planet as we could have been, but I am far from convinced that people are the sole cause of any environmental changes that might be going on. I wonder what other things may having a much greater effect on our planet:

The orbit of the moon around the Earth is increasing by about an inch and a half each year. Tidal flow weakens because of it. Is this affecting the earthquake/volcanic activity, as well?
Increased solar flares. It messes with satellites in orbit. How might it mess with our atmosphere in general?

Mega quakes, like the Great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 2004 that actually cause the planet to wobble (although just slightly) on its axis.

What effect do these activities (or the combination of any or all) have on what happens on the face of our world?


(please note: the wikipedia links were not my initial source of info on these occurances - just convenient links to get the ball rolling)
[this is good]
As a Christian this makes total sense to me. We are told there is going to be an end time. I hear the liberals mocking Christians because we don't worship the almighty earth and live on the adrenalin of 'people are the problems of the world so lets rid ourselves of the christians and save the muskrats.' Well....I went into a tangent.

I do think you are right Webby (Norm called you that and I like it). All of the earths changes doesn't have much to do with humans.

This is way off subject...but...I do think in the end time, we are told in the Bible that the earth will be burned up. I think many folks are trying to explain or understand the bible by way of newspapers. I've heard that nuclear weapons are what the bible speaks of, blah, blah, blah. There are so many theories.

But I don't think we humans can really imagine what is going to happen. I don't think it will be us to cause this, This is God's cleansing the earth and I think when He cleanses this earth it will be something much more dramatic and spectacular in size and scale then we can imagine.

I think about the flood. That's hard for me to imagine but I suspect when God cleanses the earth it will be something as big and dramatic as when He flooded the earth. .
Other things I wonder...Where (and what times of the day) are they taking the temperature readings they say prove the temps are rising (major cities with an abundance of steel and concrete during the absolute heat of the day)? Why do they refuse to acknowledge natural climate changes in their reports? What kind of gases are we releasing into the air when we open all those soft drink cans and bottles?
[this is good]
Or my hairspray or opening my refrigerator door? I've watched a news special about the inaccuracies on Fox News. They showed where some of these folks are placing temperature readings, One of them was behind a building right next to the heat and air unit. Duh... The whole news special showed many locations with intentional placings for the readings to be manipulated.

I thought aerosols were reformulated to be environmentally friendly waaay back. Just ruse?

Gee. Al shouldn't trust his cronies so much.

above is suppose to say: folks are placing their temperature reading instruments.
And the same for ending of comment.

Maybe the aerosols were reformulated, I don't know, but if they were someone needs to fill in the lefties on that info.


Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement